Sanae Takaichi, Japan’s inaugural female prime minister, is navigating a diplomatic crisis as friction between Tokyo and Beijing intensifies regarding Taiwan. What commenced as a reserved exchange of greetings has rapidly escalated into one of the most acute standoffs between the two Asian nations in recent memory.
Escalating friction between Tokyo and Beijing
Just a month into her tenure, Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi is embroiled in a significant global disagreement. Merely days following her meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping, the relationship between Japan and China has sharply declined, exacerbated by strong language and nationalistic passion. The immediate origin of this discord arises from Takaichi’s statements concerning Taiwan, which Beijing considers a fundamental national concern and an integral component of its land.
During a legislative assembly on November 7, Takaichi declared that any potential Chinese aggression against Taiwan—situated a brief distance from Japanese territory—would be regarded as “a situation jeopardizing Japan’s existence.” Her remarks indicated that such an occurrence might trigger a defensive military reaction from Tokyo. This change represented a significant deviation from earlier Japanese governments, which had historically refrained from suggesting direct military participation in Taiwan’s protection.
Beijing reacted with fury, denouncing Takaichi’s remarks as a grave interference in China’s internal affairs. The response was not limited to diplomatic statements. Xue Jian, the Chinese consul general in Osaka, published a post on X (formerly Twitter) declaring, “The dirty neck that sticks itself in must be cut off.” The post, quickly deleted, was condemned by Tokyo as “extremely inappropriate,” while Taiwan described it as a direct threat.
China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs came to Xue’s defense, stating that his remarks were a response to Japan’s “perilous and mistaken” declarations. Authorities accused Tokyo of eroding China’s sovereign rights and cautioned that the matter of Taiwan constitutes an unyielding boundary.
Echoes of “wolf warrior” diplomacy
The episode has revived memories of China’s so-called “wolf warrior” diplomacy—a combative foreign policy style that gained prominence in the early 2020s. At the time, Chinese diplomats often used social media to confront critics head-on, sometimes in inflammatory terms. Although Beijing had sought in recent years to soften this approach to rebuild trust with Western nations, the latest confrontation indicates a possible return to that aggressive posture.
Within China, nationalist voices and state media outlets have amplified public outrage against Japan. The People’s Daily, the Communist Party’s flagship newspaper, described Takaichi as “reckless” and warned that “crossing the line on Taiwan will come with a price.” An account associated with China’s state broadcaster mocked her, asking, “Has her head been kicked by a donkey?” Meanwhile, Hu Xijin, a prominent commentator and former editor of the Global Times, escalated the rhetoric further, writing that China’s “battle blade for beheading invaders has been sharpened” and suggesting Japan would face destruction if it intervened in the Taiwan Strait.
Takaichi has subsequently attempted to minimize the incident, explaining that her remarks were theoretical and not meant as a policy announcement. Nevertheless, her standing continues to be uncertain. Japan relies significantly on China, its primary trading partner, despite growing apprehension regarding Beijing’s military buildup in the East and South China Seas. Reconciling national security interests with economic reliance has emerged as one of Takaichi’s most formidable obstacles.
A delicate diplomatic balancing act
Takaichi’s approach reflects her long-standing conservative stance on national defense. A protégé of the late former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, she has advocated for a stronger military posture and closer cooperation with the United States and regional allies. Her administration’s early statements about Taiwan, coupled with her meeting with the island’s representatives during the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit, signaled a continuation of Japan’s gradual shift toward a more assertive foreign policy.
During her meeting with Xi Jinping in South Korea in late October, Takaichi emphasized the importance of a “strategic, mutually beneficial relationship.” However, she also raised concerns about China’s military maneuvers near disputed islands in the East China Sea—territory claimed by both nations. That discussion, though seemingly cordial at the time, foreshadowed the deeper friction now unfolding.
The ongoing diplomatic dispute arises at a notably delicate juncture. This year commemorates the 80th anniversary of World War II’s conclusion—a conflict that persistently influences both Chinese and Japanese national identities. Beijing observed this occasion with an extensive military procession, displaying its military might and reinforcing its historical account of opposition to Japanese aggression.
In the lead-up to the anniversary, Chinese officials accused Japan of minimizing its wartime atrocities, while state media released several films depicting Japanese soldiers’ brutality during the war, including dramatizations of the Nanjing Massacre. The Japanese embassy in Beijing even advised its citizens to speak discreetly in public, fearing potential hostility amid rising nationalist fervor.
Taiwan’s historical legacy
The deep-seated antagonism between these two countries predates the Second World War, being intricately linked to Taiwan’s own convoluted past. Having been a Japanese colony since its transfer from Imperial China in the late 1800s, Taiwan stayed under Japanese dominion until Tokyo’s surrender in 1945. Subsequently, the Nationalist government of China assumed authority over the island, only to withdraw there after their defeat by the Communists in the civil conflict of 1949.
Since then, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has regarded Taiwan as a breakaway province destined for reunification. From Beijing’s perspective, the conclusion of World War II represented the island’s “liberation” from Japanese occupation—a narrative deeply ingrained in the nation’s political identity. Chinese officials often evoke this history to reinforce claims of sovereignty and justify their opposition to foreign involvement in the Taiwan issue.
When questioned about Takaichi’s statements, Chen Binhua, spokesperson for China’s Taiwan Affairs Office, referenced this shared past, asserting that Japan bears “historical responsibility” for its colonial rule over Taiwan. He declared that China had “restored” the island 80 years ago and warned that any attempt to obstruct reunification would be met with firm resistance.
The uncertain path ahead
The ongoing diplomatic predicament underscores the persistent instability within East Asian geopolitics. Japan’s expanding security collaboration with the United States and its augmented defense expenditures have already attracted Beijing’s close attention. Presently, with Takaichi at the helm, Tokyo seems prepared to embrace a more assertive position on regional security matters, especially concerning the stability of Taiwan.
For China, this matter goes beyond simple diplomacy; it delves into the core of national identity and sovereign rights. Consequently, even the mere hypothetical mention of Japanese military participation in Taiwan is viewed as an outright act of provocation.
While both governments may ultimately seek to de-escalate tensions, the incident underscores how fragile the balance remains between two of Asia’s most powerful nations. Each misstep risks reigniting old hostilities that never fully faded with time.
In this climate of suspicion and lingering historical grievances, each utterance holds significant importance. For Takaichi, who has only recently assumed her position, the task involves steering Japan’s course between strategies of deterrence and diplomatic engagement—upholding peace while resolutely defending national interests. Her ability to strike this equilibrium without exacerbating tensions with China will probably determine not only her effectiveness as a leader but also the future direction of East Asian affairs in the upcoming period.
