In Union County, South Carolina, the cotton mills that once supplied many jobs have vanished. Now, the county is labeled as a “food desert,” indicating residents are often distant from grocery stores. Acknowledging this challenge, local non-profit leader Elise Ashby initiated a project in 2016, working with farmers to deliver affordable boxes of fresh fruits and vegetables across the area, where around 30% of the population is Black, and about 25% face poverty.
At first, Ms. Ashby financed the project using her own savings and minor grants. But in 2023, her work gained substantial support as the Walmart Foundation—the charitable arm of one of the country’s largest companies—awarded her organization more than $100,000 (£80,000). This funding was included in a larger $1.5 million initiative designed to assist “community-based non-profits led by people of color.”
“It brought me to tears,” she admitted. “It was one of those moments where you realize that someone truly sees and values your work.”
Just two years ago, programs like this were widely backed by major corporations across the U.S., as the country reckoned with systemic racism following the 2020 murder of George Floyd, a Black man who died under the knee of a Minneapolis police officer.
Nonetheless, numerous corporations are now withdrawing from these pledges. In November, Walmart revealed the cessation of certain diversity programs, which includes the closure of its Center for Racial Equity, a key player in funding the grant received by Ms. Ashby.
Firms like Meta, Google, Goldman Sachs, and McDonald’s have undertaken comparable actions, highlighting a more extensive corporate retraction from diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs.
This shift marks a notable cultural change, driven in part by fears of legal challenges, regulatory scrutiny, and social media backlash—pressures exacerbated by the new U.S. president.
Since taking office in January, Donald Trump has actively sought to dismantle DEI programs, pushing for a shift back to “merit-based opportunity” in the U.S. He has directed the federal government to eliminate DEI initiatives and begin investigations into private companies and academic institutions suspected of “illegal DEI practices.”
Within the early months of his second term, the Department of Veterans Affairs closed its DEI offices, the Environmental Protection Agency placed nearly 200 civil rights employees on paid leave, and Trump dismissed the country’s top military general—a Black man—after his defense secretary previously suggested he should be removed due to his association with “woke” DEI policies.
At first glance, it might appear that the U.S. has given up on improving outcomes for historically marginalized racial and identity groups. Yet, some experts propose that these programs may continue, though perhaps rebranded to match the evolving political environment of a country that has recently chosen a leader focused on contesting “woke” policies.
The Roots of the Backlash
DEI-style programs first gained momentum in the U.S. during the 1960s in response to the civil rights movement, which sought to expand and protect the rights of Black Americans.
Originally described through terms like “affirmative action” and “equal opportunity,” these programs sought to address the enduring impacts of slavery and the institutional discrimination enforced under Jim Crow laws.
As social justice movements expanded to include women’s rights, LGBTQ+ advocacy, and racial and ethnic diversity, the language describing these efforts widened to embrace “diversity,” “equity,” and “inclusion.”
In corporations and government bodies, DEI initiatives primarily concentrated on recruitment strategies that positioned diversity as a financial benefit. Proponents contend that these programs tackle inequalities across different communities, although the primary focus has traditionally been on racial equity.
The drive for DEI gained momentum in 2020 during the Black Lives Matter demonstrations and rising calls for societal reform. For example, Walmart committed $100 million over five years to create its Center for Racial Equity. Wells Fargo named its first chief diversity officer, while companies like Google and Nike already maintained analogous leadership positions. After these developments, S&P 100 companies generated more than 300,000 new jobs, with 94% allocated to people of color, based on Bloomberg’s findings.
Nonetheless, as swiftly as these initiatives grew, a conservative pushback arose.
Stefan Padfield, the executive director of the conservative think tank National Center for Public Policy Research, contends that DEI programs inherently separate individuals based on racial and gender differences.
Recently, detractors have amplified their assertions that DEI initiatives—originally crafted to fight discrimination—are themselves prejudiced, especially against white Americans. Training programs that emphasize “white privilege” and systemic racial prejudice have faced significant criticism.
The roots of this opposition stem from conservative resistance to critical race theory (CRT), an academic framework that suggests racism is deeply embedded in American society. Over time, campaigns against CRT in schools evolved into broader efforts to penalize “woke corporations.”
Online platforms like End Wokeness and conservative personalities such as Robby Starbuck have leveraged this feeling, directing attention to companies for their DEI efforts. Starbuck has taken credit for changes in policy at firms like Ford, John Deere, and Harley-Davidson after revealing their DEI programs to his audience on social media.
One of the most prominent triumphs for this movement took place in spring 2023, when Bud Light encountered significant backlash for collaborating with transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney. Demands to boycott the brand and its parent company, Anheuser-Busch, led to a 28% drop in Bud Light sales, based on an analysis by Harvard Business Review.
Another major turning point arrived in June 2023, when the Supreme Court ruled that race could no longer be a factor in university admissions, effectively dismantling decades of affirmative action policies.
This ruling raised questions about the legal basis of corporate DEI policies. In the wake of the decision, Meta notified employees that “the legal and policy landscape surrounding DEI has shifted,” shortly before announcing the end of its own DEI initiatives.
Corporate Retreat: An Issue of Authenticity
The swift retreat of DEI programs among prominent corporations raises questions about the genuineness of their dedication to workforce diversity.
Martin Whittaker, CEO of JUST Capital—a non-profit that surveys Americans on workplace issues—believes that many companies initially embraced DEI efforts to “look good” in the wake of the Black Lives Matter movement, rather than out of genuine commitment to change.
Nonetheless, not all companies are yielding to political and legal pressure. A report by the conservative think tank Heritage Foundation noted that while DEI programs appear to be in decline, “nearly all” Fortune 500 companies still include DEI commitments somewhere in their official statements. Additionally, Apple shareholders recently voted to maintain the company’s diversity initiatives.
Public opinion on DEI remains divided. A survey by JUST Capital suggests that support for DEI has waned, but support for related issues—such as fair pay—remains strong. Similarly, a 2023 Pew Research Center survey found that a majority (56%) of employed adults still believe that workplace DEI efforts are beneficial.
