The continuous trade disputes between the United States and China have created substantial strains on American tech enterprises, compelling them to adjust to unforeseen financial hurdles. The latest tariff hikes by President Donald Trump’s administration have altered the fiscal landscape for companies dependent on Chinese production. For numerous technology firms, these measures have resulted in heightened expenses, interrupted supply networks, and greater unpredictability, leaving the industry in a vulnerable state.
Deena Ghazarian, who established Austere, an electronics firm located in California, felt the impact of these shifts directly. Not long after starting her company in 2019, she was confronted with an unexpected 25% tariff on the premium audio and video accessories imported from China. The business, which showed initial promise, rapidly became a financial challenge. The new expenses, absent before, jeopardized the company’s viability.
Deena Ghazarian, founder of the California-based electronics company Austere, experienced the brunt of these changes firsthand. Shortly after launching her business in 2019, she found herself facing a sudden 25% tariff on the high-end audio and video accessories her company imported from China. What began as a promising venture quickly turned into a financial struggle. The additional costs, which previously did not exist, threatened the survival of her business.
“I honestly thought my company wouldn’t make it through its first year,” Ghazarian recalls. The sudden implementation of tariffs forced her to absorb the added expenses to stay competitive, leaving her margins razor-thin. Although Austere managed to endure the initial challenges, the company now finds itself navigating a similar predicament as tariffs have returned with even broader scope and higher rates under Trump’s second term.
The current tariff structure significantly impacts a wide range of electronic goods, including smartphones, tablets, laptops, and video game consoles, many of which are predominantly produced in China. According to the Consumer Technology Association (CTA), China remains the largest supplier of electronics to the United States, with imports totaling $146 billion as recently as 2023. This includes 78% of smartphones, 79% of laptops and tablets, and nearly 87% of video game consoles entering the U.S. market.
Stores such as Best Buy have already cautioned about the repercussions. CEO Corie Barry recently mentioned that most of the added costs from tariffs would probably translate to higher prices for consumers. Likewise, tech producers like Acer and HP have announced intentions to increase their product prices, pointing to the financial burden resulting from the trade policies.
Although some companies have looked for other manufacturing options outside of China, moving supply chains to places like Vietnam, Thailand, and India, these changes are neither swift nor inexpensive. Mary Lovely, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, notes that creating new supplier connections requires time and significant investment. Moreover, only a few countries provide the same level of scale and expertise as China, which continues to be a key player in global tech manufacturing.
The tariffs form a part of a wider approach by the Trump administration aimed at tackling trade deficits, promoting domestic production, and curtailing the influx of illegal substances and migrants into the U.S. Nonetheless, these strategies have prompted backlash from major trading partners, such as Canada, Mexico, and China, increasing tensions and complicating global trade relationships.
Domestic manufacturing in the U.S. has seen slight growth as a result of these tariffs, with firms like Apple increasing production in India and Taiwanese chipmaker TSMC spreading its operations to Arizona. Despite these initiatives, the move towards localized production encounters obstacles, such as elevated operating expenses and strict regulations.
For smaller enterprises such as Austere, the lasting effects of these tariffs are a major worry. Ghazarian considers the option of increasing prices to counteract expenses but is concerned about the potential to drive away customers in an already challenging economic landscape. “Customers have a threshold for what they consider worth paying for,” she notes. “Exceeding that limit means we might lose them altogether, particularly with inflation already squeezing household finances.”
For smaller businesses like Austere, the long-term consequences of these tariffs remain a primary concern. Ghazarian acknowledges the possibility of raising prices to offset costs but worries about alienating customers in an already strained economic environment. “There’s a limit to what customers are willing to pay for perceived value,” she says. “If we go beyond that, we risk losing them entirely, especially with inflation already tightening household budgets.”
The possibility of an economic downturn in the U.S. introduces additional complexity to the situation. Should growth wane, the administration might reassess its tariff strategy to prevent further economic harm. Currently, though, the likelihood of relaxing trade barriers appears slim, as Trump has indicated intentions to increase tariffs on Chinese products and broaden duties to other nations.
The potential for an economic slowdown in the U.S. adds another layer of complexity to the situation. If growth falters, the administration may reconsider its stance on tariffs to avoid further damage to the economy. For now, however, the prospect of easing trade restrictions seems unlikely, as Trump has signaled plans to impose even higher tariffs on Chinese goods and extend duties to other countries.
Despite these obstacles, Ghazarian is resolute in her efforts to adjust. By building up inventory prior to the latest tariff implementations, she has managed to secure temporary respite to endure the challenging period. Looking forward, she is investigating ways to reduce expenses and exploring alternative production techniques to keep her business running. “I had hoped to concentrate on growth and innovation, but unfortunately, much of my time is dedicated to strategies for survival,” she laments.
Despite these challenges, Ghazarian remains determined to adapt. By stockpiling inventory before the latest tariffs went into effect, she has gained temporary relief to weather the storm. Looking ahead, she is exploring cost-cutting measures and alternative production methods to keep her business afloat. “I had hoped to focus on growth and innovation, but instead, so much of my time is spent on survival strategies,” she laments.
The ongoing trade war underscores the delicate balance between economic policy and its unintended consequences. While the administration’s tariffs aim to achieve broader geopolitical goals, they have created ripple effects that reverberate through industries and households alike. For U.S. tech firms, the road ahead will require resilience, adaptability, and a willingness to navigate an increasingly uncertain global trade landscape.
